Put a number on every bar.Effort against result.

0:00 · Charles VincentYeah, so the easiest way to explain this is just the picture you are going on a debate stage with world-class teams of debaters who are studied, who are, again, this language is an alien language, so you know nothing yet. And you’re going up against teams where it is their first language. They know the punctuation, the grammar, the content, everything to such a degree, and they [unclear] as a team. This stage, this global stage that’s live, if you were to go there and you just cherry-picked a couple things like I know a few verbs or punctuation or some grammar, you would get annihilated, destroyed consistently, you have no chance, and if you were to win, it would just be brief and you would immediately after that get destroyed for much more than you probably won. That’s how trading works. Most people go into this place, and what they do is they try to learn things that are usually just, I don’t want to say shill, but most popular and most visually understood. So for example, like [unclear] in Japan’s or moving averages and things like this, they’re not useful. But the point is that those things are all lagging indicators. The most real-time way to actually read what’s going on is by reading the tape. This is Richard Wyckoff more than a hundred years ago. What he did was as a little 15-year-old tape boy, he would take from the ticker the information out to the people on the floor. And what he did is that so consistently that he actually learned the method of how to pick up institutional footprints and how to track them and how to ride their coattails. So what this is is just fundamentally that. I teach things that are layered on top of that. This is a little bit past the tape, but the point is to assess a bias is one thing, to use that bias with real time via the tape is so critical and so incredibly useful once you see it actually play out. Because there is no waiting for an MA to curl or something like this. It’s actually exactly real time. And so in that instance, the debate analogy, you must learn to first read the language linearly, one sentence at a time. And then once you’re fluent, once you can actually speak and understand and grasp it without having to allocate bandwidth to just try to comprehend what’s happening, then you can stack on the punctuation and then the complex contractions and whatever it is. But you first must read bar by bar, which is just simply candle and its volume compared to the next candle and its volume. It sounds very simple, but it is all you actually need to trade successfully. [unclear] again, without going too far down the sounding crazy rabbit hole, you’ll see as we unpack this, just assume what I’m telling you has existed across all markets since markets were made.

3:03 · Charles VincentAnd it applies to every single one of them that has a volume bar at the bottom. That thing is universal across all markets and all timeframes. Generally, the smaller time frame you go down to, of course, the more noise there is and less signal. But the point is that it still works. And so I’m going to walk through everything just visually so you guys can see just we went through last class was exhaustion, how to catch turns and reversals multiple times in sequence and all this type of thing. But just simply, I guess, Col, if you can’t speak, can you type? Have you seen the tape reading section on my page? Like that link?

3:47 · StudentI think Col, at some point when you were talking there, I think his mic might have worked if because it did something with the mic. Oh, there, right now. Col. Yes, can you hear me? Yeah, we’re good. Good.

4:07 · Charles VincentCool. Did you hear what I just said?

4:10 · StudentI did. And now I haven’t [unclear] that section.

4:13 · Charles VincentOkay. Yeah. And it’s the most fundamental. It’s so critical that people actually learn this before throwing any indicators, anything else on it. There’s no point to throw your money at the market unless you can read what’s being said. And so this thing, what I’ve done is I built a very linear, structured delivery of how to read the tape while also including a simulator. So you just actually go through it and you can do it after class, of course. But the point is that bar by bar teaches you how to read exactly what’s being said. And so I’m going to show you now on chart. And so it will make more sense. But just understand, just because it seems complex, you’re not supposed to get it now. But just like reading a language over time, if you immerse yourself like these guys, they’ve been doing it, Drew’s a while in now and [unclear] must be over a month now and Ren a couple months. The point is that it’s like anything else. It does become more visible over time. It’s just what people do in this place that is the most destructive is they set unrealistic expectation as to when they’re supposed to comparatively to somebody else be at a certain place. And that’s not how this works at all. There’s a level of essentially compounded epiphanies that happen as you learn certain things they stack and then they unlock visually across and then you can’t unsee them. But the point is, is just linear. We’re going to go through this from the beginning because this is the fundamental of it all. So as I’m going through this, just tell me if you have any questions because I will just keep going if nobody says anything. I don’t want to confuse or leave the question marks. Did that make sense?

5:59 · StudentYeah, that’s great.

6:00 · Charles VincentOkay. The important thing to note is, is there, remember what is the word, Drew, decisive close past?

6:10 · StudentRight? Yeah, yeah. The decisive close past, the range break.

6:16 · Charles VincentYeah. So at the lows, did we have any follow through that mattered? Sorry, just a second. [unclear] on. I can’t see the chat room. Is there any, is there a message in the chat that I’m not seeing?

6:28 · StudentYeah, there is. Is effort, while volume as metric reflecting participation, from Col?

6:38 · Charles VincentYeah, exactly. So that is the gas. That is the total amount of fuel required regardless of the [unclear] and the why. It’s just that thing as a metric simply is just the amount of effort required to make that close. And this applies to all time frames, but the point is, that’s how we weigh it. So it’s just simply gas required and then candle close is distance. Distance that that gas got you. No problem. And if you guys, I don’t know if you guys are, I guess nobody sees in there. If you could just chirp up, Col, to like say it out loud because I can’t, I can’t see any of these, the chat. But either way, so next. Now, after this one, this is where it gets really interesting because we have what’s called, this is within this point, I don’t want to go too crazy down the Wyckoff rabbit hole, but we know that there’s preliminary support in here. Now, aside from that, next candle. So this to this, this spread is obviously indecisive. And if I had to guess, I would say something like it fits in here 20 times. So 20 times, except it took about 40% of total effort, which means it is substantially harder. Multiple folds, multiple hundreds of percents, harder to push down. Not only is it harder, but there’s substantially less participation. So it’s twofold. And it has made no external move past that there is no further progress. Now, the next one, this is where it gets really interesting. And we’re going to see how to catch these things. So this print, remember, just comparatively between this and this, that’s, I’d say roughly about a third. So 30%.

8:23 · StudentThis is down into our selling climax, right?

8:26 · Charles VincentYes, [unclear] climax is right here. Okay. And so this, this, the difference though, between these two, it only took about half of the effort for this little move. So now we know an extra 30%. What does that mean in Emad in terms that between this and this part, compare them against each other?

8:55 · StudentJust, just comparing these two, I don’t see any difference between these two because it’s twice, [unclear] displacement, twice effort.

9:06 · Charles VincentYeah, pretty similar. We just know that it’s not getting any easier to push down. And so what we really have to assess then, and I’m going to just, I’m going to show you one step past and I’m going to go back to micro in on how you actually catch the bottom of the bottom. So this difference, this what is called a change of character, it’s a range breaker change of character, because there’s a range that’s broken and closed above. Now the difference, this obviously engulfed both of these, not this. So all we do is compare the total distance, just like the spread inversely here [unclear] here to here is about 30% of this candle. So that volume stacked on top of this volume, something like where that wake is versus this volume. So it took 300% the effort to move roughly one third. All we do is multiply those [unclear] to find out the actual, what is the current imbalance? So what is the current imbalance between these two and this? How much easier is it to push it up here than it was down here?

10:10 · StudentLike six times easier, I guess.

10:14 · Charles VincentYeah, exactly. Now like 600% is a massive difference. It doesn’t tell us how far it’s going to go, but what it does tell us is that there is a obvious effort or [unclear] to push up. So what we need to understand is what does that mean? Pause, I mean, follow through again, without a macro bias, without actually understanding what we’re looking at, completely different story. But the point is this is where we get really able to zoom in and understand what we’re looking at. So just as a kind of zoomed out, last class we were very, we were centric on turns. Now what we’re going to do this class is momentum. So we’ll first roll what we learned last class into the [unclear] how to catch it, and then how to play it and how far to. So this thing, remember, what we’re looking to is not just learn to read the tape. This is a little bit more advanced, but I’m now going to show you how to catch it at the lows. And I know you guys have a kind of basic understanding of this so far, but let’s just, I’m going to use the replay button to cheat. So I can zoom in without having to rewind. So that’s on a four hour. We’re going to go down low enough where we can see what’s happening. So just simply that same difference. When we come down and we see this bar, which was a total of that larger bar, is immediately 50% reversed after sweeping the lows. It required a lot of effort. So this, the differential between these two tells us there is finally demand, but it’s still easier to push down. So that tells us whatever bounce should likely be faded to how much further it doesn’t say, but it tells us the imbalance is still easier to push down. And so as we write it up, same thing, we just gauge. Now, this, what we talked about before, it’s the same difference. So when we go up that candle versus this candle, this is a lot of effort for not the equivalent. It’s still easier in this instance to push up. So it doesn’t mean that it’s going to go down right away. Like again, obviously it messed around a little bit, but then these two, this, this moved down. This was ease to not only close below the neckline. That tells us again, these two candles against this, that some sort of [unclear] is coming in and it’s now engulfed. So what we’re looking at is still an imbalance of down. So what we do is we zoom in to catch whatever we can, as far as the CAP specifically is just brilliant in these instances. When we have a bias that shows us a specific direction, we just slap the fibs on and within that OTE, within that sweet spot, there are multiple tells of bearish engulfing and retests to that specific area, there’s area, uh, [unclear] the box and bear value gaps and all this. But the point is when we have a break of structure, you know,

13:15 · Charles VincentThen you need to go down this rabbit hole too far, but this is a break of structure tells us we are still pointing down. And then now, like we exact same thing we just did the exhaustion as it rides, we’re going to take this strong candle as the indicator to is effort, which still above the moving average. So that tells us intention is it increasing or decreasing and how much? So let’s compare this to this. I’d say about a third of the spread, right? 30% and about just for round numbers, we’ll call it 200%. So what is 200% effort required, but only 30% of the spread? What is the difference?

14:06 · StudentOne six in

14:10 · Charles VincentTotal, like how much harder is it for this one? If it took again, call it 200% six,

14:16 · StudentSix, six, six, five, nine, eight.

14:19 · Charles VincentAnd so now this is where it gets really interesting is the next one that proper selling climax sweeps the lows sweeps past what is now and every bar we’re supposed to do this, this I just left there, I forgot. Every single bar that has some sort of wick, especially when it’s higher than the average volume, we put this at external so we can identify clearly, was there a decisive close? Was there intention or was there immediate reversal? And what this tells us this number, same differences way that that little doji versus how many times it fits into here, I don’t know the number, call it 20, call it 10 for round number. But it takes again, round number, call it half, or double the volume, sorry. So it’s something in the range of 20 times harder to push down. Right? That’s a massive difference. And again, within this, that is a picture momentum as a semi truck that is screeching to a halt. It has weight, but [unclear] requires distance and runway to stop. And then when it stops, it’s a slow turn. It doesn’t need to be immediate and fast unless we’re on something specific that has incredibly high support value. It can take its time. This is where most people get messed up. And so now, the difference is we would, if this made some sort of close, we would put this here, this is not so we can if it needed put it later, but for now, the important area to note is here. Every candle as we know, is whatever move is made, if it’s immediately reversed, [unclear] 50% or greater, that is weakness. If you just simply take this, and this, and put them into one candle, that’s a total body from here to here, with a wick going up to here, and a wick going down to here. It’s a bearish candle. But that combined is not strength. It’s the opposite. Right. So it’s attempting to go down, but getting pushed up every time while the participation is falling. And now the difference, remember between these two, it’s about the same as far as percentage wise, like ratio to each other. So now, as opposed to clear ease down, we have an imbalance. This is indecisive. These two combined don’t really tell as much of a story. But when we zoom in, we see a lot of information. So what we’re trying to identify is multiple things. So when we have a creek that

16:58 · Charles VincentIs broken and retested, and again, this is not the right time frame to see it, but our job is to zoom in to the right time frame, so you can see it. So whatever this is, we don’t care necessarily of what happens. It’s just that at this point, this is exhaustion, clear exhaustion from a sweep past prior what was not respected. It’s now telling us we’re not ready to go further yet. And so, okay, and I don’t want to go too down the advanced rabbit hole. But this tells us a clear story of same thing. Now, we can actually see the specific bottom. That thing at the very lowest of lows told us not today, and then immediately 1234 candles engulfed. That tells us the differential, remember 1234 stacked is what this little bit of volume was able to do. That tells us, remember, that there’s many people have the misconception, we talked about this last time, you do not need strong demand or supply to turn the market. What you need is, if there’s exhaustion, just some, because there are no sellers that have the ability to push down further. Remember, just mathematically, this thing was able to engulf all of these. That is, again, I don’t want to visually stack these, it’d be somewhere up here, but that’s a massive imbalance. We can say somewhere in the range of 10 times easier to push up. And so now what we have to see is following forward, is that thing respected? Is it showing us that it is not making any new lows, but instead still following forward with that ease and able to engulf multiple candles while close above the range? Closes [unclear] through is always the tell. And so this thing on an entry, as far as an entry goes, if you were prepped, an entry would be here, an entry would be here, and another entry would be here. How far the distance of how far it travels is something completely separate. But the point is following it forward. Now I’m going to zoom back out to the four hour. That’s all that ended up printing. That whole, all of that information that we just got there before I go too far,

19:33 · Charles VincentIt all was contained within here. So do you guys understand? Does that make sense or was that confusing?

19:43 · StudentThat makes sense for me with the, you said there was three entries on that with the first one at the top before the break of structure, was that catching a short from the clock down into the OTE and then longs from that point?

19:57 · Charles VincentEverything at this point after that level of exhaustion is a long, there’s nothing short. Oh, you see that punches that [unclear] of a wall. All we’re looking for is this specific level. So remember the wick low, we’re looking for then another wick low. And then we’re looking for reclaim after failure. Right. Right.

20:18 · StudentWhat’s that? That’s our real selling climax down there, right? Like that was just the preliminary before.

20:24 · Charles Vincent[unclear] That’s when we zoomed out the four hour. That’s what it looks like. But the point [unclear] to get you guys to understand that is most important. You can’t just like on the the two minute or three minute or whatever tiny timeframe, those are mostly noise, especially if you don’t understand how to roll visually candles together. Like for example, this is a change of character. This is a change in state of delivery. The CISD. It’s not accurate. But the point is this thing is actually one control bar on the right timeframe. [unclear] you guys see the right timeframe? Can you identify that it’s even there? That’s another story, right? Like that thing, a breach of this strength, pass the CISD after exhaustion, after reclaiming both of these areas is a massive tell. This is a much later entry than what I just showed you. But the point is, can you actually identify what is the change of character on the lower timeframes without zooming out? That is where the, as you get more fluent, the tells become more obvious. But what would make more sense? Did any of you guys actually catch that this turn had all of those tells within it? No, I didn’t tell. And that’s okay. Like it’s not supposed to get it initially, but.

21:51 · StudentI’m curious of Col. Like I’m curious where he is with it. Like did that, did he say that made [unclear] Yeah, [unclear] did. Didn’t make sense to me. Absolutely. I’m familiar with the terms tell. I’m familiar with, you know, looking at bias of this is, and also I’ve done some work on volume, but nothing like you’re showing here. So I’m finding this very, very interesting, even though I’m being quiet on one end. Yeah, good. I’m actively engaged. Unfortunately, I’ve got an electrician about to drop on my doorstep, so I might have to break off early, but yeah, this has been good. Thank you. No worries. Hey, that’s the best part of this. We can jump off and jump on whenever we want it, right? So I just had to do it with my technician for our wifi before this. So anyways.

22:42 · Charles VincentAnd all the classes I put on the, I just started a YouTube channel. They’re all there and I put them on my website as well. So after this, we actually, it’ll take me a couple hours, but I’ll slap the link to the finalized class clip on the actual website. And I’ll send you guys the link in the telegram.

23:00 · StudentSo you could just start from any point. Yeah. So I’ve said that I’ve said the link to that type reading, which I’ll have a look at later today. Thanks.

23:08 · Charles VincentYeah. So now what I want to tell you guys, if you guys all grasp that, that whole concept, how we roll this together and how the CAP is so just simply beautiful in the way you can, you can actually use it for targets. Most people, when they play these things, they’re, [unclear] I know you said you’re short term within within the day, which is fine. But the point is most people would catch this if they could somewhere around here and close somewhere around here. What I teach is something very different. The way to actually acquire wealth in this place is by running the runners. Most people have no idea how to do that. And so by tying all of these, this, what is Wyckoff and Elliott’s wave and order flow together, we can actually grasp that there is a specific math to this that plays out just like anything else. It’s not 100%, but the majority of the time, if you can actually read it, it does print in a way that is usable. And so, for example, starting, remember, I didn’t mention this yet, so, but it’s common knowledge to the other guys. When we identify a low has taken place, something has breached, and we see a significant volume tell. What we know then is to assess is the move, and this is completely different months in the study by itself, is the move impulsive or corrected? What that tells us is direction, direction of follow through rather than just weakness and continued role. It tells us both, but the point is, is that in this map, as this prints forward, just simply the easiest way to do it, I want to, so it’s not confusing. I’ll print it forward. But, excuse me, how we print this is there’s a wave count. It’s wave one, two, three, four. This whole thing is a wave one, two, three, four, five. So wave one, two, three, four, five. And then that area is where you would look for failure, where you would look for exhaustion. And I’ll just print it so you guys can see this. But I know Drew, you, I think, know this well enough to understand that. Do you see that this is what this is?

25:10 · StudentYeah, in a way, it’d be, you know, for maybe if they don’t, like on a, it’s going to stay on another, on a higher timeframe, but I get what you’re trying to show. So I see it.

25:21 · Charles VincentI see it. Yeah. And ending diagonal with a print, which is, again, I don’t want to go too down that rabbit hole because it’s going with the conversation. But the point is, after we then see this clear A, B, C, we assess the same thing. Was that area breached, reversed with strength? And if it was, remember, our strength is not required necessarily for the movement. It is the imbalance, the difference between how ever many candles this and gold after this wall that it punched, swept the lows, immediately retested. So that I’ll zoom in just so you can see. But the point is that retested another CAP setup is there. Again, it’s just over and over and over. We just have to actually look for it. So that thing, a specific move down, respect and inability to close, control bar out after this is called a golden pocket, that close above, it doesn’t need to remember the imbalances what we’re waiting. But the point is, in this test, we actually want to see volume at the test. Bullish volume. We don’t necessarily need to see it at the spring. This is the tell with now the other impulsive follow through, which is one, two, three, four, five. And what comes after that is a much less intentional A, B, C. And where does it go to? Just like this [unclear] It went to the four lows. This is past the four lows. And same thing, it reverses springs and tests over and over and over. This is not a precise thing. But the point is, all we do is just at the bottom, we read the date. Did that low, remember, just follow it forward. Did that low tell us continuation or reversal? And again, is this the right time frame to even see? This is the coolest part that you have, especially with the ability to replay, [unclear] go back in time and assess this low after it was reclaimed with about the same differential. Was there greater or less of an imbalance? Did it breach and engulf and tell you that this spring was followed by a test that failed and immediately these two stacked against this one is a large imbalance. This is something like 400% easier to go up. And then the range that [unclear] the low of the fours is now control board passed. So change of character passed.

27:48 · Student[unclear] this, the Elliott’s wave in the CAP, it’s just perfect. And then you got your five wave coming out of that with the ABC. Right?

27:58 · Charles VincentYeah. And you can see this now and see this is how many months did it take you to actually be able to see this? But there’s a specific character that it differentiates between impulsivity and [unclear] And then there’s a specific distance that actually prints during these moves, during the what is correction and to a specific point, which is the four lows. And then we look for the imbalance, which is the change of character that tells us the S there is supply present. And this isn’t just another test after the initial spring. We’re only on the one minutes. This is tiny. But the point is all these tells exist in all time. They’re not always as straightforward as this. But the point is they don’t need to be there’s [unclear] But as long as you learn how to read the tape, bar by bar, they just they print over and over and over, up or down. It doesn’t matter. Corrective, impulsive, doesn’t matter. We just we don’t care what it does. We just read what it’s telling us. And we play it. There’s nothing more than that. And so in all instances, it’s just that played forward. So before I that was just an overview. I know that took a while. Did you guys have any questions?

29:04 · Student[unclear] you are you like in the [unclear] end of Elliott’s wave and that kind of stuff? Yes, I am. I’ve used Elliott with probably another product [unclear]. I used it for many, many years. And I’m actively using that in the minis at the moment. I So find that fairly effective trading between the [unclear]. I’ve learned what better experience not to try and [unclear] and trade the [unclear] So I really gravitated just to trading the key support and resistance point and going from there. I’ve actually mucked around a bit with AI and I’ve written a little bias indicator in NinjaTrader, which I’m finding I’m getting patterns. I’m doing an observation program at the moment around about anywhere between 50 and 100 observations. [unclear] what I’m seeing is a bit of a pattern around rotations forming at the high resistance and support levels. And from there we’re getting the turns. But it’s only about three days ago I opened up my old volume and started to read that. So I find this quite ironic that this is that’s a subject [unclear] this morning. So yeah,

30:22 · Charles VincentGood.

30:22 · StudentIt’s fine with you. [unclear] sounds like [unclear] What’s that? With what he designed for Ninja [unclear] there. That’s right up. Yeah, well that’s where AI comes in very handy these days. But you’ve got to direct it. You’ve got to ask the right question. That’s looking at VWAP and a few other bits and pieces.

30:46 · Charles Vincent[unclear] right. And it’s funny that one of the things I sound kind of, I guess crazy is the word to most people from saying this, but I believe it truly. I’ve been through some shit and understand. At least I understand this is true for me. I think it is for everyone. But the point is I believe we’re exactly where we’re meant to be. And it’s not always apparent until after the fact. And all we have to do is just keep moving forward with the best foot forward we can. And things will just present like opportunities, like you just said, the fact that this timing rolls together is just so beautifully ironic. It seems like it’s too coincidental to be possible, but it’s just how it is. And so just take it and run with it. And so the point is, what I want to show is in these instances, as we’re here, I want to again not go too far down the rabbit hole, but we have to understand that there’s layers of confluence that stack that we must identify. And so if we don’t, we’re just shooting ourselves in the foot. It’s like flying blind.

31:41 · StudentAnd so the point is... I’m going to have to take my leave. Sorry, my Sparky’s arrived. [unclear] worries. Definitely follow through. Okay, thank you very much. [unclear] See you on the next one, Col. You will. Thank you. Good day, boy.

31:57 · Charles VincentSo one of the tricks... Now, in this... Who’s left here?

32:06 · StudentEmad. Okay, I’m here. Okay, [unclear]

32:11 · Charles VincentSo now, this thing, what I want you guys... Now that we can go a little bit more advanced, actually he’s probably pretty well advanced if he can count the [unclear] already as well. The point is that in this move, I’m going to just veer off the tape slightly. Can you guys identify that this is corrected? Like first off, from here, and then to the retest. Does that make sense? Why

32:42 · StudentCan’t I [unclear] that as a corrective? You just said up to... Like before it breaks, right? Before the... I can’t do it with my most, but over just in between the 17th and the 19th, in between that range,

33:01 · Charles VincentIs that what you’re referring to? Everything. This is the [unclear] corrected.

33:04 · StudentOh, I can’t either.

33:07 · Charles VincentYeah, and so that’s okay. But what you must understand, [unclear] I don’t want to say the most powerful tool I have, but if it was a matter of math, like this is 51% or greater, the most powerful tool that I have to identify this clean, like without having to take my time and just, you know, process it. With a line? Just simply, impulsive versus [unclear] The simple characteristics of what impulsive is, [unclear] is not. This is showing... Like the move up is, the move down is corrected. The move up is now, again, all it is is just simply, this is impulsive, and then this is corrected, and this is still corrected. The point is, is that the entirety of itself, we are looking at a move with intention down, and then this whole thing prints, it’s again, just in simple terms, that. How does this make sense? If we know what the counts can be, remember, wave one is either an impulsive or a triangle or leading, right? Wave this A is one of those. It is impulsive. B is a triangle, which you can see clearly if I just actually map it. Well, no, no, it’s clear, but this is a triangle. It also prints off in an impulsive structure, [unclear] the point is A impulsive, B triangle, A, remember, this is A, B, C. So what is this? An impulsive, B with a triangle at the end, so A, B, C, another five wave, or this is actually a ABC with a five wave here, so one, two, three, four, five. The point is that over and over and over, what does this mean? How do we use this? We should specifically look for failure points at the extensions, at the Fibonacci extensions of what this is, and I know, Drew, you went over this a little bit, but the point is that if this thing is, remember, the size of scale around matters, but if this thing is, so if this thing prints and it shows you this, [unclear] the one to one A equals C, same as we’ve done every other time.

35:37 · Charles VincentThis is the, remember, if we’re moving up, all we’re looking for is the failure at down. Where is the failure down? At the fourth wave. How do we identify it? With a ray, telling us reclaimed or not reclaimed, breached or not reached, retested with low volume or not retested with low volume, control bar past that. All of these things are compounding, telling you the entire story that you need, but you must take the time to study, to see them without being flustered. The easiest way to do it is to just simply make a checklist, like is in the CAP or whatever one you want to make for yourself, but the point is, did what I just said make sense before I go off on a tangent?

36:27 · StudentYeah, Emad, what do you think of that? It’s crazy how, you know, with the Fibonacci’s, you know, but yeah, Emad, what do you think? Yeah, as far as I’ve seen here, two things count my attention. First one was the way we identify the A and B, because A should be impulsive and B should be triangle.

36:53 · Charles VincentNot should, could. So they have the option of being either. And if we know that, then we can tell what it actually the next print is. So there is, again, this sounds a little bit crazy, but there’s simples, there’s complex, there’s triple threes, double threes. The point is, it’s only a certain number of known things and a certain amount of total sequences. So it’s just solving for X. It’s not even that complex. Like Emad, I know that [unclear] makes more sense to you. But the point is that it is actually just solving for X with a, with a maybe six variables. But you have to learn the variables first.

37:35 · StudentYeah, okay. And the second part is the failure around the waveform of the previous main move. So, so we should identify the zone of the waveform and then we try to see how this new move is reacting around that level. So we identify that as a correction or a new impulsive move.

38:02 · Charles VincentExactly. And as we’re going... The distance of wave one,

38:05 · StudentRight? And is that going down the [unclear]?

38:09 · Charles VincentThat’s exactly what it is. And so just the how to identify what is wave one, [unclear] just simple terms is I’m going to do it up and down because it doesn’t make a difference. But the point is roughly, roughly, right? That thing, you just measure the one and carry it to where the four lows are. Does that make sense?

38:35 · Student[unclear] Because wave one is roughly the distance of wave five as a guide.

38:44 · Charles VincentAnd [unclear] So I’ll zoom in so you can see more granularly what it is. But the point is, whatever though, and it’s not just like Drew said, as a guide, right? Not as a... If it doesn’t end there, it’s not that. It can be multiple variants of it. The point is, you just draw it forward, take the end. We’re looking for failure around this point. This actually becomes, it’s really cool how it often actually works as an area of resistance and something to be respected as if this is a breach down after a swing failure pattern, that tell, that close, that’s actually the entry. Sometimes we get a retest, but the point is, is that in this instance, so for example, these things are telling us that we have C’s rough extension is here from... The distance of C, we should expect wherever that, I deleted the fit, but the point is it’s right around here that we actually look for failure. And then once we [unclear] that this thing shows us what it exactly is, we then just play the failure. And it’s just simply re-entering in a range that was clearly identified and then playing the intention. Play the intention, take the swing.

40:02 · StudentYeah, because you have everything you need in there from your break of... Everything from the CAP is in there from the break of structure following.

40:09 · Charles VincentYeah, clear as day. The point is precision sweet spot touch, the specific corrective retrace up to it, weak retrace, failure at the top, sweep the failure, control bar back... And there’s multiple tells if I zoom in closer, but the point is, it’s just using this over and over. And so the point of this class was not to actually go down this route, but also kind of stop, but all that makes sense.

40:33 · StudentWhat it did, and I remember you were touching on with, because your cell is much different with letting the runners run and being able to have a really good grasp on Elliott’s wave through it all. So yeah, I was curious a bit with not necessarily that one, but with letting those targets run.

40:59 · Charles VincentLet’s play it forward in a way that you can actually relate with. So I’m gonna... We’re gonna go specifically to when I told you to put in all your money. And how? Okay. How’s that sound? Yeah. Good. So that aside, once we’ve identified what this is, through all the things we just remembered, our start, which point was here, but all these tells exist through all of it. So let’s just actually play it forward. And so this is actually very relevant to current time. But from the lows, this breach, this is... [unclear] true. Are you up to reading this?

41:55 · StudentYeah. Okay. How much do you think? Start here. Okay. So sorry, put your arrow where? Okay. From the move down. So remember,

42:05 · Charles VincentJust watch the starting point. If you haven’t already caught here somehow, this is the neckline. This is the first bar that is above the average. Remember, before all the shit printed, this is substantially... The average is moved. Like, here, I’ll show you so you can understand. When we take all of this stuff off, it doesn’t look tiny. It looks like it’s a massive move above the average. And what that is, is a close below the neckline. That tells us down. However many entries there were a cap or whatever the fuck before. [unclear] This is now our start. So let’s just move forward in what is more simple to catch. So next versus this one. What does it tell you?

42:55 · StudentFor the next handle printing, we are obviously in a bearish... We’re in a bearish reaction here. The differential pressure between the two is huge. For a massive move down between these [unclear] candles... [unclear] hold on.

43:13 · Charles VincentIt just said something that was false. You’re... Well, I could have misinterpreted. So the differential, what do you mean by that?

43:21 · StudentThe differential between the prior, the turn that it was starting to take and then the big force down. I meant the move between those two. It was much more force being put into it. [unclear] more volume and much more result for a move down.

43:39 · Charles VincentYeah. And so the question is, yes, clearly supply is present. But the question is, is the imbalance, is the effort versus result or in the simple terms, the gravity increasing or decreasing or nothing? Nothing changing. Just more weight being added.

43:58 · StudentEmad, I hear a mic coming on. You jumping in? Yeah, I guess nothing has changed. It’s exactly the same. Exactly. No, I’m good at this.

44:09 · Charles VincentOne to one. This is a very close mirror of the effort versus result. Massive amount of actual supply coming in. But has it gotten easier? No, not necessarily. [unclear] So all we do is do is print [unclear] forward. And again, after a move like this prints, in case it wasn’t clear already, the bias is down. Where to completely separate conversation. But after this, remember on the four hour, we can zoom in and see, remember, we talked about this early days, Drew, be the wick, right? All we want to do is catch what is the resistance failure of the ABC before further. Where to again, separate. The point is the second. So now,

44:52 · StudentAnd that’s you go. Sorry. I saw a cat move in there, but I’ll be your officer.

44:58 · Charles Vincent[unclear] so the point is there, but the question is now, what is the, what’s happening? You tell me between these two bars.

45:07 · StudentYeah. Okay. So, you know, it’s showing a little bit. It’s showing some slow down now with the, you know, like I always looked at two with the inertia in the beginning, that semi truck, [unclear] know, we’re going through that right now and it’s starting to slow down. So the effort between these two, you’re getting roughly the same volume, you know, the effort stepping in, but you’re getting [unclear] know, 25% the result you did.

45:38 · Charles VincentSo what does that mean? How much harder is this to push? [unclear] in simple terms.

45:42 · Student75%. In a percentage that would be, it is getting harder to push by, I’m gonna say the number wrong.

45:56 · Charles VincentWell, how many times 25 going to 100, which is percent? Yeah, yeah, four. Yeah. So that’s 400% hard, roughly, right? Right. Okay. Yeah. Oh, and so also as a kind of sidebar, this move, remember, we have actually almost half of it is demand. Right. Right. So that aside, stick with that 400% for now, then go to the next one. Okay. What’s it telling you?

46:33 · StudentDemand is starting to come in, less volume, much less volume, half the volume.

46:39 · Charles VincentIt’s coming in. [unclear] pause, I’m going to call you on everything you say. Okay. Expanded. Where does it show you that demand is coming in more than last part?

46:48 · StudentWhen I say the demand, is that now I wanted to say in relation to where the close is in the candle. I’m taking from the high, the mid and the low. So I now think one’s saying that wrong. Yeah.

47:08 · Charles VincentDemand would be the underside, wake on a downward. So the point is, in each instance, our job is to assess, remember that magic simple line. Did it make a decisive close?

47:21 · StudentNo.

47:23 · Charles VincentNo, no, decisive. Was, remember, the ease to move down was what?

47:33 · StudentWas much, was getting less.

47:36 · Charles VincentMuch less. So much less participation.

47:39 · StudentYeah. Yeah. Half the participation.

47:42 · Charles VincentYeah. So what that tells us, remember, it’s eased, pushed down, but it didn’t make any new ground. Right. Okay. So that information tells you a lot, but let’s just move forward and see if you can unpack

47:56 · StudentHow to actually play this. As in, you know, this is being sucked up at this point, you know, starting to be sucked up at this point, right?

48:03 · Charles VincentLike, [unclear] not sucked up. What it tells us is there’s, remember, our, I don’t want to zoom in too down. Actually, yeah, we can do that since.

48:11 · StudentRight. Like we got to be close to the preliminary support in here, right?

48:14 · Charles VincentBut that’s what it is. They don’t really print it. [unclear] Right. Okay. Yeah. So so now that we see what is the, what is the print? Right. What is this in comparison to the entire move so far? And then what is this? Why [unclear] terms?

48:38 · Student[unclear] effort versus result.

48:40 · Charles VincentNo, no. PS and.

48:42 · StudentOh, [unclear] selling climax, right? Yeah, exactly. And how do we tell? Yeah. Okay. How do we tell that with the okay, with the preliminary support, that will be our highest, one of our highest volume signatures before. Well, we’re obviously with our selling climax, we’re going to have our highest, you know, selling climax volume signature there. But for the preliminary support, we’re also going to have our last, you know, effort of the buyer stepping in, right?

49:15 · Charles VincentI mean, the first tell that the trend is slowing and enough to take note of. Right. They’re selling climax. Remember, just now, so far, all we have is these three candles, because they have not engulfed this. So we have this low, and it [unclear] to do compared to this, but these two now as one compared to this.

49:40 · StudentYeah, so these two compared to this one, they we are now getting an ease of about. This be about 50%. No, I’d be much more it would be more than that. Is it a needs? Well, I’d be no harder to

50:05 · Charles VincentPush down this on top of this, right? That the whole volume of these two combined is here.

50:12 · StudentOkay, right. But then it’s also taking up that, you know, it’s completely reclaim. It’s going to for your line there that you drew, you know, we’re going to be pretty close to there. So it’s about 75% of the previous candle. You know,

50:28 · Charles VincentAlmost 100% of the effort, right? Yeah. So what does that tell us? Easier to push down or easier to push up?

50:35 · StudentEasier to push up. Is it? Oh, God. It’s just simple terms, right? Like what is easier to push up? Well, it’s that it’s just listen.

50:47 · Charles VincentJust remember, okay, this plus this is two thirds of this, right? Yes, this plus this is more than two thirds of this, right? Yes. So it took more effort than it was able to move that percentage of spread. Right. So it’s harder to push up. I misspoke. The effort, the imbalance is still easier to push down, harder to push up. Right. Does that make sense? I’m going to tell you.

51:23 · StudentThis is going to tell me a little bit of, you know, we are still this bar compared to the previous bar is a, [unclear] Emad, giving your percentages. 20. It’s a little bit stepping in, but it’s half the volume. You know,

51:56 · Charles VincentLike it’s not [unclear] of a volume and about one third of the distance. Right. So it’s not about, yeah. So the imbalance, what was these two showed a clear difficulty to push up versus this. This is showing it’s about even. Currently. Okay. Right. Yeah. So what does that mean? Nothing yet. What’s the follow through though? That’s what we need to know.

52:17 · StudentThere you go. Emad, I kicked on. Did he have? Yeah, I was thinking that. [unclear] previous tables are showing that it was easier to go down, but later we have seen that we have some kind of balance between going up and going down. So by comparing these four candles, can we conclude that the going down is getting a little bit harder?

52:46 · Charles VincentYeah. Yeah. What is this last candle? Tell us.

52:52 · Student[unclear] candle tells us that going up is getting really hard.

52:58 · Charles VincentAnd by a factor of how much? Just [unclear]

53:01 · StudentYeah. It’s around 2.3, 2.4, 250%. Yeah.

53:10 · Charles VincentYeah. And so this in simple terms is a tap on what was resistance on top of a swing failure potential pattern to roll over potential. It hasn’t printed yet, but that’s, it’s telling us. Not straight yet. Yeah. What does that tell us?

53:31 · StudentGoing down is easier than going up. Same price displacement with lesser force. 200% easier.

53:39 · Charles VincentYeah. And one of the cool things that is so subtle. This is when we’re in this level of what is sideways, we actually have to zoom all the way in. And it says. That’s now control bar down. After a retest. So remember, I just want you guys to see the granularity. That is. A move down. That is not strong. So on the time frame we’re on.

54:14 · StudentAnd Charles, wait, wait. That was a perfect five wave with an ABC. Right. That what you were just on. Holy. Yeah. Right. [unclear] I don’t know if it was that time. Yeah, but it was a five wave up and an ABC down into sweeping the fourth. Anyways, I was going somewhere with that, but. Yeah, it was the effort result. We were coming back and we were in a correction. Oh, sorry. Something Emad mentioned. I was going to run with it with something.

54:51 · Charles VincentWell, no, it’s the point that it showed you. What could be identified in that time frame as a control bar, except that control bar, while still valid [unclear] very low follow through behind it. The effort is not required necessarily to push it down. But the point is, is that we have closed below support. Was this impulsive? Was this corrective? Was this a high volume retest potentially or a low volume retest? And so the point is, is that there the imbalance we know right now is currently two times easier to push down. But Drew identified what was the low of the fourth being swept and then reclaimed. Now what does it tell us?

55:32 · StudentWe’re going up. It is, yeah, being reclaimed. At this point, we are showing also while comparing the candles, we’re now having a bear or a bullish reaction. So the differential between the two. It’s, you know, even between the three, we are being engulfed. It’s just that it’s a clear indication of it’s bullish.

56:04 · Charles VincentWhat’s the word for this?

56:07 · Student[unclear] change of character. What type?

56:13 · Charles VincentA range breaker. Exactly. And so how do we compare this to these?

56:19 · StudentOkay, with the rank, how do we compare to those? You mean in the sense of stacking them or?

56:28 · Charles VincentIt’s all down moves that were engulfed stacked versus the move right and comparing that.

56:36 · StudentYeah, and it did make a decisive close below that previous candle as well. And you know, took off in there.

56:44 · Charles VincentNo, no, I just just just let’s get to the [unclear] first. So stack these volumes is about this high, right? So that means it’s substantially more or less effort required to move up. While also this thing is about, I don’t know, rough ballpark, about 300% taller. So while it required more effort, something by 30%, it also was 300% bigger. So what is 30% added to 300% bigger, roughly.

57:23 · StudentYes, I mean, the [unclear].

57:26 · Charles VincentJust the rough, right? Like it’s approximately 400% easier to push up based on the. Now, just in terms of the way we know based on PS, SC, what comes after that? An automatic rally. Yeah, and where to.

57:45 · Student[unclear] it is usually the. Oh, fuck, it’s going to be. It’s not the distance of the PS, is it roughly?

57:58 · Charles VincentFirst up, we’re looking for our first member. The automatic tell of it is that it’s actually low volume relatively to the selling climax. This so far tells you there is yes, it’s moving up on low effort. Where to, though, the tell is, does it break through here with intention or not? Does it fail or not? Right, right. So this tell now, I don’t want to zoom in yet. Just step forward.

58:28 · StudentEmad, you’ve seen this with the automatic rally and the selling climax. Are you, do you notice it? Yeah, I see the change of current character. I see the range breaker, but I couldn’t see the automatic rally after that. [unclear]

58:47 · Charles VincentSo the automatic rally is a simple A, B, C up to preliminary supply for support in this instance.

58:54 · StudentI’m just going to back. I’m from each level.

58:59 · Charles VincentThat’s preliminary support. So all it is when we’re in a trend, we look for what is the highest counter trend volume tell. Of them. Right. And so this is technically the in this instance, because it’s the highest counter trend of the that’s preliminary support. The [unclear] the counter trend pause prior to the SC. But that also tells us that the SC is highly probable [unclear] which is obviously the largest volume signature. And so, [unclear] in terms to simple terms, we’re looking for automatic rally to fail somewhere around here. So I’ll zoom in so you can see more more detail. But the point is that is not strength. Can you see that?

1:00:06 · StudentYou met. Sorry, I missed that last part. I was writing something. Can you repeat it?

1:00:14 · Charles VincentYeah, so all it is is just simply looking for whatever was preliminary support. Our job is to now look for and it’s actually it’s cool to identify them as it’s going. So this candle largest counter trend volume. And then the next one, is it making more or less is more coming in or less? And just the actual volume of it is something I don’t know the effort required for result was easily around two or three hundred percent easier to push up. So while there is more volume coming in down, we’re also getting more volume. For demand for bullishness. So these things, while it’s cracking, while it’s actually printing forward, we can tell what’s actually printing. And now we want because this is PS, that is where the automatic rally usually goes to in what is a corrective nature. And that thing, again, rolls to the right time frame. You can see clearly this is not a strong candle. What happens here is a completely different story. But the point is, if we just roll together, what is our count? One, two, three, four, five, A, B, C, clear as day, right? And then that thing, what is a one, two, three, four, five, down to sweep the fourth and then up.

1:01:32 · StudentYeah, so it’s also a [unclear] Right with the with our all our structure. Yeah, yeah, exactly. It’s all of it. Right.

1:01:38 · Charles VincentAnd so these things over and over again are this. But now that we have remember, we’re just going to stay on that time frame for now. What is this telling

1:01:52 · StudentYou? New CISD.

1:01:54 · Charles VincentSo so not just the CISD. What I’m asking for is the imbalance. So massive volume signature between these two candles. What is the difficulty to push up?

1:02:14 · StudentIt’s around 70 percent less price displacement with around three times higher volume. So it’s around 400 percent harder to push up.

1:02:30 · Charles VincentPerfect. Simple as that. Like it’s just round numbers is perfect. And then we roll together what the count is, where the actual resistance is, and then what’s next. So do we look for a short here? Again, this is a separate conversation. And actually, I don’t want to we’re almost going over time. But the point is from this, this sequence is structured. Did that help? Like, did anything was it confusing or did it actually track to how to use it?

1:02:57 · StudentNo, I think for me, this is beautiful because we’re going into like a ST or something after this. But as far as up to the phases that we’re up to and breaking down the candles to get up to this, it’s been good for me.

1:03:18 · Charles Vincent[unclear] might have any questions.

1:03:22 · StudentNo, it’s clear for me. It’s a bearish move at this. The essence of the move is bearish, but we see climax of supply in a bearish move. Then we have a change of character which moves to the after the breaking range, which moves to that candle with that automatic reality. And when we see that exactly the same exhaustion in the [unclear] in the bold move, the bearish move should continue.

1:03:58 · Charles VincentAnd so there’s right now, though, the tell is because what we’ve done is we’ve created a range, range high, range low. So excuse me, that thing is critical to identify. How do I identify it properly? It will make more sense as it unfolds, but it is the top of the automatic rally, the bottom. And then the difference between whatever the right timeframe is on per range, it is the dual closes. So that would be a top. That would be a top for now. This would be a bottom. This would be a bottom. So like this. And then we just let them tell us how the interactions actually print moving forward. And so it will unfold to something more clear than this. But the point is that’s how you identify just clear extremities, just like in the way that we’ve identified that this is what was a move down so far. These now printing too. That’s actually a key area of what is currently we’re above its support. So now this one engulfed here, that tells us the differential. We’re roughly about even. There is no clear tell. It did not engulf both, just one. So the move forward, this is where, again, our Wyckoff understanding is really critical because then we could start playing this thing. And actually, there’s a lot of money to be made in ranges. But also, let’s take a look. So just what I want to do for about 10 minutes prior, I want to answer questions so we don’t go too much over and get too deep in the weeds. But I want to actually start from here in the next class forward. So depending who you have, if they want to understand it or not, we’ll try to go as basic as possible through it. But the point is, do you guys have questions about anything so far in this class? And what was the one before you met?

1:05:43 · StudentYeah, you might. Yes, I have some. First of all, I have a question about the stacking volume in candles in different timeframes. I need to put an example. Assume that we are looking at one minute time frame and we have one very big bearish candle. And then it continued with four bullish ones. And the volume of that bearish candle is small and the bullish ones are big volume.

1:06:21 · Charles Vincent[unclear] for context, it matters where that occurred. So where are you referring to? What part of the schematic did the reaction take place?

1:06:33 · StudentOh, I haven’t thought about the context about this situation. Okay. [unclear] then we stack all these one minute candles together, we see a small bearish candle with very big volume. So we automatically assume that we have very big afford, but very small price displacement. So we assume that the bearish move is big. But when we look at one minute time frame, we see that the bearish move was very big and continued with four bullish ones with very big volume. I mean, the big part of that volume is for bullish moves. And when we stack them together, we see a big volume for that bearish move. I can’t understand. It’s a little bit hard for me to understand how we identify that weakness, because it can be misleading.

1:07:46 · Charles VincentYeah, I’ll show you the best that I can without actually having the example. So I think I know what you’re saying. So just simple terms, if we go back to what was this, that thing, are you talking about something like on a more zoomed in time frame? [unclear] this thing printed, and then we had an imbalance like this, like that there was strong what seemed like bullish move. But when we zoomed out, it was actually retraced mostly like a bottom heavy wick. Or what do you mean specifically?

1:08:27 · StudentI mean, that the big part of one candle, the big part of the volume of one candle comes from the [unclear] move in this example. But when they stack together, we see all of that volume for the bearish one.

1:08:48 · Charles VincentYeah, like what I mean is this, right? So just for example, this shows us a massive difference in what is obviously selling heavy, selling climax, right? And then if we zoom right into it, we’ll just actually see what took place. [unclear] one minute. Actually, I’ll let one of the first two get into it. What time frame was it?

1:09:56 · StudentIs he talking with something like rolling together with like a sign selling climax, like that big, you know,

1:10:01 · Charles VincentWell, the tell is he’s asking how much specific because all you see is a move down that is heavily bearish, but then it’s retraced. And when you at least what I think is the comparative, right? So like this, the move prior, so the actual the low of the move starts here. [unclear] thing just ballpark. This actually half of this volume was above that point. And so every tick below, that’s actually a large bullish signature and then even more bullish signature. And then these members, this about 30% of his candle is bullish. So breaking it down, I can’t really go much further than the one minute. But the point is to just zoom in and actually identify. It’s one part of the store. The most important part, though, is the counter, the actual what is the imbalance after the opposing direction prints. Right. So like it just as

1:10:56 · StudentWe go through the balances that you want to look at coming out from it. Right.

1:11:01 · Charles VincentYeah. Like like all of the instances, you can just see in this instance, volume increasing, but candle length not. Right. So that’s harder. Yeah. It’s telling us it’s getting substantially harder. And then the difference, remember, just comparatively speaking, we are now at this low is where we want to see decisive or indecisive. And this candle remember 50% is the tell that the prior is weak. It’s now that the entirety of what was the close, I don’t know, 75% retraced with one third the volume roughly. Right. So that math tells us whatever this was, it is now punching the wall to some degree. And what we need to see is a move up to tell us that it’s finally ready to release some of that energy in the opposing direction, regardless of how little participation is just so diminished returns to push down that the most easy way to balance the market is just by releasing some of that pressure up.

1:12:02 · Student[unclear] that [unclear] this is ball under the water? Yeah. I’m curious if that answered him up. Yeah, I kind of grasp it, but I need to think more about that.

1:12:17 · Charles VincentTry it. Do me a favor. Just in between now and next time. Capture that like take on your screen, the specific exact thing that you’re talking about, and then save it and we’ll open it unless you have it there. Now, we can talk about it.

1:12:30 · StudentYeah, yeah. I’ve written down that I will I would share it. Yeah. Okay, cool.

1:12:35 · Charles VincentSo aside from that, any other questions you guys can take?

1:12:38 · Student[unclear] can even circle it like I do with the red ring. I don’t know if he uses. Yeah, whatever. You got a blue one, but yeah, and then we can go on talk about it. Yeah.

1:12:50 · Charles VincentSo from what we just went over there, is there any other questions you guys can think of?

1:12:56 · StudentNo, I was hoping that you were going to say that we could roll a lot of this. I’m actually excited for the schematic, you know, us to break it down and, you know, obviously much more, but I was hoping you were going to roll that into the next one from around the automatic rally. So that’s great.

1:13:15 · Charles VincentYeah. But no further. I just don’t want to confuse whoever new comes and they watch this over. They’re like, what the fuck is talking about? Right? And it’s, it’s, it’s like overwhelming. And it’s almost to the point of discouraging because it’s so alien times three, like Eliot’s [unclear] of an overflow on top of what is Wyckoff. Right. So yeah, yeah, simplify is important, but also if it’s just us, fuck it, we’ll talk about this stuff. Yeah. And what you guys want to hear about. For sure. Moving forward, we’ll pick up from here. What is this April 25? And we’ll do the actually the entire run. And I’m really, I don’t want to go over time because I know diminishing returns on capacity to understand, but I want to actually show you, Drew, where you put in all of the money and why. And how far like the very, very big run after, because if we just play the things when it tells us it’s the thing, you don’t have to sell at external. You can sell it.

1:14:14 · StudentYeah. Yeah. Yeah. Because this actually happened to us, right? When, [unclear] you told me. Yeah. Like I had already entered, but at that point there was so much more steam left in it.

1:14:26 · Charles VincentIt’s one of these things that like, if you just get in, you’re like, Oh no, I’m just going to take 10% of the market. No, man. There’s so much more. Yeah. You don’t understand.

1:14:33 · StudentI know. And I remember coming to and you’re like you, you’re like, wow, just like what lucky, you know, thing or who’s watching over you with the time. And like, you know, what we [unclear] connected. Yeah.

1:14:45 · Charles VincentCool. Okay. So, uh, for next time, uh, if you guys just, yeah, he might find that, [unclear] and then anything that didn’t make sense, try to expand on a little bit. [unclear] as far as in, in, if you have blocks, um, and then, yeah, any questions, make sure the right thing down next time.

1:15:05 · StudentOkay. That sounds great. I’m looking forward to it.

1:15:08 · Charles Vincent[unclear] Cool. And [unclear], uh, uh, not available to speak, but it is. Everything’s good. So,

1:15:14 · StudentOkay. Sounds good. Bye guys. See you next week. Yeah. [unclear] Bye. See you next week. Hope you all have a great week. So YouTube. Bye. Bye guys.